Educational and Pedagogical Sciences | Article | Published 2023-03-29

DEALING WITH CULTURAL CLASHES

Authors:

Azimjon Ahmedov

Gulira'no Oybek qizi Ro'zimuhammedova

Publisher: «МОЯ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНАЯ КАРЬЕРА»
Collection: «ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ И НАУКА В XXI ВЕКЕ»
Keywords: Culture, multiculturalism, inequality, culture change, cultural divides, identity and conflic.

Abstract

This article describes cultural clashes and how to resolve this problem in the society. As all know cultural conflicts in negotiations tends to occur for two main reasons. First, it’s fairly common when confronting cultural differences, for people to rely on stereotypes. Stereotypes are often pejorative (for example Italians always run late), and they can lead to distorted expectations about your counterpart’s behavior as well as potentially costly misinterpretations. You should never assume cultural stereotypes going into a negotiation. Instead of relying on stereotypes, you should try to focus on prototypes—cultural averages on dimensions of behavior or values. There is a big difference between stereotypes and prototypes. For example, it is commonly understood that Japanese negotiators tend to have more silent periods during their talks than, say, Brazilians. That said, there is still a great deal of variability within each culture—meaning that some Brazilians speak less than some Japanese do. Thus, it would be a mistake to expect a Japanese negotiator you have never met to be reserved. But if it turns out that a negotiator is especially quiet, you might better understand her behavior and change your negotiating approach in light of the prototype. In addition, awareness of your own cultural prototypes can help you anticipate how your counterpart might interpret your bargaining behavior. It’s not just about being aware of their culture, but also how yours might be viewed.

References

  1. Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómez, L. H., Kurtiş, T., and Molina, L. E. (2015). Decolonizing psychological science: introduction to the special thematic section. J. Soc. Polit. Psychol. 3, 213–238. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564
  2. Adams, G., and Markus, H. R. (2004). “Toward a conception of culture suitable for a social psychology of culture” in The psychological foundations of culture. eds. M. Schaller and C. S. Crandall (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 335–360.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J., and Aycan, Z. (2018). Cross-cultural interaction: what we know and what we need to know. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5, 307–333. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104528
  4. Armacost, B. (2016, August 19). The organizational reasons police departments don’t change. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2016/08/the-organizational-reasons-police-departments-dont-change
  5. Astin, A. W., and Oseguera, L. (2004). The declining “equity” of American higher education. Rev. High. Educ. 27, 321–341. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2004.0001
  6. Bowen W. G., Kurzweil M. A., Tobin E. M. (2005). From bastions of privilege to engines of opportunity. Chron. High. Educ. 51:B18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brannon T. N. (2018). Reaffirming King’s vision: the power of participation in inclusive diversity efforts to benefit intergroup outcomes. J. Soc. Issues 74, 355–376. 10.1111/josi.12273 [CrossRef]
Loading...
0

Views

0

Reads

0

Comments

0

Reviews

0

Liked

0

Shared

0

Bibliography

0

Citations

Like and share on

Cite this publication

Copy text below and use in your article