Cognitive and Language Sciences | Article | Published 2020-11-16

Agnonym Differences In Names

Authors:
Collection: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF— INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATIONS AND RESEARCH
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6760681
Keywords: Keywords and expressions: Agnonym, linguocentric, anthropocentric, toponymy, linguistic source, ecolinguistics, language norm.

Abstract

Annotation In this article, the author emphasizes on one of the most actual issues of today is the further refinement of the purity of the Uzbek language and the prevention of distortions in the nomenclature and the correct use of words or terms. Not following the traditions of Uzbek nationality in naming will lead to some ambiguities in the language, as well as the elimination ofdifferences in the prefixes.

References

  1. REFERENCES
  2. 1. 1 . Alisher NavoLMuhokamat ul-lug'atayn.
  3. Translation by Vahob Rakhmonov. ■-
  4. Tashkent: Tafakkur
  5. 2. N.Mahmudov. Journal of Word
  6. Art.20l8.№l
  7. 3. Marufjon Yuldashev. Fundamentals of
  8. literary text and its lingvopoetic analysis. -
  9. Tashkent' Fan, топ?
  10. 4. E.Begmatov, A.Mamatov. Literary norm
  11. theory. (Laws of formation and existence
  12. of the literary norm. Part 111. - Tashkent:
  13. 1999.
  14. 5. Arkhangelsky N.P. Central Asian issues of
  15. geographic atainolGgy and transcription.
  16. Tashkent 1934, p.14
  17. 6. Hoshimov O. Inscriptions in the frame of
  18. the notebook. - Tashkent: Sharq, 2013.
  19. 7. A.Sobirov. Current issues of linguistics: VI.
  20. - Tashkent: AkademnasHrj 2012.
Loading...
0

Views

0

Reads

0

Comments

0

Reviews

0

Liked

0

Shared

0

Bibliography

0

Citations

Like and share on

Cite this publication

Copy text below and use in your article