Architectural and Environmental Engineering | Article | Published 2022

Seismic Risk Assessment of Jizzakh Region

Authors:

Vakhitkhan Ismailova

Sabriddin Khusomiddinov

Akhror Khusomiddinovch

Sharofiddin Yodgorov

Shukhrat Avazov

Collection: AIP Conference Proceedings 2432, 030035 (2022); Published Online: 16 June 2022
Keywords: seismic risk, construction materials, macroseismic research, seismic intensity, seismic isolines, GESI_Program, vulnerability function and degree

Abstract

This article enlightens the seismic risk of the buildings in residential areas in the Jizzakh region. Strong earthquakes and their losses have been analyzed on the basis of construction materials of the buildings in residential areas of Jizzakh region. The damage diagrams of the buildings and structures have been made up and their values have been determined based on the maximum acceleration of building materials and seismic impact points by Using GESI_Program developed by the United Nations Global Earthquake Safety Initiative. At the same time, seismic risks due to strong earthquakes (at points 6, 7 and 8) have been assessed at regional level. Depending on the results of the research, the direct economic losses of the population and the territory of Jizzakh region in strong earthquakes have been assessed and proposals have been developed to mitigate the effects of strong earthquakes. Based on the results obtained, movement of emergency rescue units in emergencies will allow to optimize the planning of construction of individual housing estates on the basis of standard designs.

References

  1. 1. Dzhuraev A. // Damage to individual houses made of local building materials during strong earthquakes//
  2. Problems of seismology in Uzbekistan Tashkent № 2 -.2005. pp. 233-23.
  3. 2. Ibragimov R.N., Ziyauddinov F.F., Sodikov Yu.M., Khodzhaev A.K., Nurmatov U.O. Seismogenic zones of
  4. Uzbekistan and overlying zones, 2011.
  5. 3. Artikov T.U., Ibragimov R.S., Ibragimova T.L., Mirzaev M.A. Models of the macroseismic field earthquakes
  6. and their influence on seismic hazard assessment values for Central Asia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics.
  7. 2020;11(3):606-623. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2020-11-3-0494
  8. 4. http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/net/saito/gesi_program/index.htm
  9. 5. Tyagunov S., Ismailov V., Ibragimov R. Engineering-seismological aspects of earthquake scenario
  10. preparation: experience of the IDNDR-RADIUS project implementation in Tashkent, Uzbekistan // Proceeding
  11. of In-ternational Workshop «Recent earthquakes and disaster prevention manage-ment». - Ankara. 1999. pp.
  12. 21-28.
  13. 6. Aktamov B.U., Ismailov V.А., Yodgorov Sh.I. Earthquake damage assessment of buildings in rural areas (in
  14. the sample of Jizzakh region). International Journal of Geology, Earth & Environmental Sciences – India,
  15. 2020 Vol. 10(3) September-December, ISSN: 2277-2081. pp. 35-42
  16. 7. Bindi D, Mayfiled M, Parolai S, Tyagunov S, Begaliev UT, Abdrakhmatov K, Moldobekov B, Zschau J (2011)
  17. Towards an improved seismic risk scenario for Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. doi:10.1016/
  18. j.soildyn.2010.08.009
  19. 8. Cua G, Heaton T (2007) The virtual seismologist (VS) method: a Bayesian approach to earthquake early
  20. warning. In: Gasparini P, Manfredi G, Zschau J (eds) Earthquake early warning systems. Springer, Berlin.
  21. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72241-0_7
  22. 9. Musson R.W, Gruenthal G, Stucchi M (2009) The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales. J Seismol.
  23. doi:10.1007/s10950-10009-19172-10950
  24. 10. Parolai S, Orunbayev S, Bindi D, Strollo A, Usupayev S, Picozzi M et al (2010) Site assessment in Bishkek
  25. (Kyrgyzstan) using earthquake and noise recording data. Bull Seismol Soc Am. doi:10.1785/0120100044
  26. 11. Tyagunov S, Gruenthal G, Wahlstrom R, Stempniewski L, Zschau J (2006) Seismic risk mapping for Germ
  27. Nat. Hazard Earth Syst Sci 6: pp. 573–586
  28. 12. Usmanova M.T., Nurmatov U.A., Yodgorov Sh.I. and others. Mardzhanbulak earthquake on May 26, 2013.
  29. Magazine. "Geology and Mineral Resources". No. 2, 2015. pp. 31-37.
  30. 13. Nurmatov UA, Yusupjanova UA (2016). Features of earthquake manifestations in the South
  31. Ferghana,Besapano-North Nurata and North Kuljuktau-Turkestan seismogenic zones//Collection of reports of
  32. The international conference "Actual problems of modern seismology" dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the
  33. Mavlyanov Institute of seismology of the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, October 12-14,2016.Tashkent,
  34. Uzbekistan. Tashkent, pp. 433-440.
Loading...
0

Views

0

Reads

0

Comments

0

Reviews

0

Liked

0

Shared

0

Bibliography

0

Citations

Like and share on

Cite this publication

Copy text below and use in your article