Educational and Pedagogical Sciences | Article | Published 2021-12-30

The effectiveness of the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the teaching of general engineering in higher education in Uzbekistan

Authors:

Bazar Ulugov

Publisher: Open Journal of Science and Technology
Collection: Open Journal of Science and Technology
DOI: 10.31580/ojst.v4i4.1684
Keywords: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Education, Compass 3D, AutoCAD, Descriptive Geometry and Engineering Graphics, Pedagogical and Information Technology

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of models and methodologies that integrate information and communication technologies (ICT) and education. The starting point of the review is the research questions, then keywords, selection of the databases, definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the definition of the search chains, search process and selection of papers, the analysis of the paper, and the results of the systematic review to answer the questions posed. In the systematic review, 316 papers were found in three academic databases and 75 relevant papers were selected. The work developed intends to know the different models and methodologies that integrate ICT and education. The article describes the solution of problems on the subject "Descriptive geometry and engineering graphics" using computer programs and the role of pedagogical information technologies in the process of teaching students in higher educational institutions. Peculiarities of teaching descriptive geometry and engineering graphics as part of the course of engineering graphics aimed at the mastering of AutoCAD and Compass graphic editor's are considered by the authors. The authors recommend the incorporation of mini-lectures and computer workshops into the training process.

References

  1. Alexander, Bolotin, and Bakayev Vladislav. 2016. “Educational Technology for Teaching Survival Skills to Pilots Using Training Routines.” Journal of Physical Education and Sport 16(2):413–17.
  2. Angeli, C., and N. Valanides. 2005. “Preservice Elementary Teachers as Information and Communication Technology Designers: An Instructional Systems Design Model Based on an Expanded View of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21(4):292– 302.
  3. Anon. n.d. “Inclusion Criterion - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics.” Retrieved August 5, 2020a (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/inclusion-criterion).
  4. Anon. n.d. “Information and Communication Technologies - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics.” Retrieved August 5, 2020b https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/information-and-communication-technologies).
  5. Asset, Agadilov, Toktarbayev Darkhan Gabdyl-Samatovich, and Mubarakkyzy Balkiya. 2015. “ScienceDirect Modern Pedagogical Technologies in Communicative Competence Formation.” WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCHES 182:2014.
  6. El-Hussein, M. O. M., and J. C. Cronje. 2010. “Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape.” Educational Technology and Society 13(3):12–21.
  7. Goktas, Y., S. Yildirim, and Z. Yildirim. 2009. “Main Barriers and Possible Enablers of ICTs Integration into Pre-Service Teacher Education Programs. Educational Technology and Society 12(1):193–204.
  8. Gros, Begoña, Kinshuk, and Marcelo Maina. 2016. The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Desings for Emerging Pedagogies. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology.
  9. Hew, Teck Soon, and Sharifah Latifah Syed Abdul Kadir. 2016. “Predicting the Acceptance of Cloud-Based Virtual Learning Environment: The Roles of Self Determination and Channel Expansion Theory.” Telematics and Informatics 33(4):990–1013.
  10. Jenkins-Stark, L., and T. Chklovski. 2010. “K-12 Pre-Engineering Education Engineers as Teachers: Helping Engineers Bring Cutting Edge Science to Underserved Communities.” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
  11. Jimoyiannis, A. 2010. “Designing and Implementing an Integrated Technological Pedagogical Science Knowledge Framework for Science Teachers Professional Development.” Computers and Education 55(3):1259–69.
  12. Koehler, M. J., and P. Mishra. 2005. “What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 32(2):131–52.
  13. Liao, Y. W., and H. C. She. 2009. “Enhancing Eight Grade Students’ Scientific Conceptual Change and Scientific Reasoning through a Web-Based Learning Program.” Educational Technology and Society 12(4):228–40.
  14. Lundeberg, M., M. Bergland, K. Klyczek, and D. Hoffman. 2003. “Using Action Research to Develop Preservice Teachers’ Confidence, Knowledge and Beliefs about Technology.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 1(4).
  15. Moreira, Fernando, Maria João Ferreira, Carla Pereira Santos, and Natércia Durão. 2017. “Evolution and Use of Mobile Devices in Higher Education: A Case Study in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions between 2009/2010 and 2014/2015.” Telematics and Informatics 34(6):838–52.
  16. Niess, M. L. 2005. “Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Teaching and Teacher Education 21(5):509–23.
  17. Osipov, Aleksander, Olga Starova, Anna Malakhova, Vita Vonog, Tatyana Zhavner, Polina Salyamova, Vladimir Struchkov, and Mikhail Kudryavtsev. 2016. “Modernization Process of Physical Education of Students in the Framework of Implementation of the State Strategy for the Development of Physical Culture, Sport and Tourism in the Russian Federation.” Journal of Physical Education and Sport 16(4):1236–41.
  18. Pondee, P., S. Premthaisong, and N. Srisawasdi. 2017. “Fostering Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mobile Laboratory Learning in Science.” Pp. 151–60 in ICCE 2017 - 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-Based Educational Systems for the 21st Century, Workshop Proceedings.
  19. Ramirez, Gabriel M., Cesar A. Collazos, and Fernando Moreira. 2018. “All-Learning: The State of the Art of the Models and the Methodologies Educational with ICT.” Telematics and Informatics 35(4):944–53.
  20. Revilla-Cuesta, V., M. Skaf, J. M. Manso, and V. Ortega-López. 2020. “Student Perceptions of Formative Assessment and Cooperative Work on a Technical Engineering Course.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(11).
  21. Schuck, S., P. Aubusson, M. Kearney, and K. Burden. 2013. “Mobilising Teacher Education: A Study of a Professional Learning Community.” Teacher Development 17(1):1–18.
  22. She, H. C. 2004. “Fostering Radical Conceptual Change through Dual-Situated Learning Model.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(2):142–64.
  23. Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15(2):4–14.
  24. Smarkola, C. 2008. “Efficacy of a Planned Behavior Model: Beliefs That Contribute to Computer Usage Intentions of Student Teachers and Experienced Teachers.” Computers in Human Behavior 24(3):1196–1215.
  25. Srisawasdi, N. 2015. Motivating Inquiry-Based Learning through a Combination of Physical and Virtual Computer-Based Laboratory Experiments in High School Science.
  26. Tate, D., J. Chandler, A. D. Fontenot, and S. Talkmitt. 2010. “Matching Pedagogical Intent with Engineering Design Process Models for Precollege Education.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 24(3):379–95.
  27. Tovar, E., N. Piedra, M. Castro, and M. Llamas. 2010. “A Quality Model of OpenCourseWare Applied to Engineering Courses.” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
  28. Ulugov Bazar Dzhumaevich. 2020a. “EFFICIENCY OF USE OF AUTODESK INVENTOR ENGINEERING PROGRAMS AND PEDAGOGICAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FIELD OF ‘RESISTANCE OF MATERIALS’ IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING STUDENTS OF TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES.” ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal https://Saarj.Com 10(5):130.
  29. Ulugov Bazar Dzhumaevich. 2020b. “ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫХ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ В УЧЕБНОМ ПРОЦЕССЕ ТЕХНИЧЕСКОГО ВУЗА.” SCIENCE, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT №29 (ISBN: 978-83-66401-50-1):149–53.
  30. Yang, Z., G. K. M. Pedersen, and T. Rosenørn. 2008. “Development of an Interdisciplinary Education for Future Engineering Society-Intelligent Reliable System Program in Aalborg University.” in Proceedings of 36th European Society for Engineering Education, SEFI Conference on Quality Assessment, Employability and Innovation.
  31. Zeid, I. F., R. Gonzalez, and C. Wallace. 2012. “Implementing Engineering-Based Learning in Boston Arts Academy High School STEM Courses.” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.
  32. B. Kitchenham, S. Charters Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, Engineering, 2 (2007), p. 1051, 10.1145/1134285.1134500 View Record in Scopus. Google Scholar.
  33. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan is for us a solid foundation for the development of democratic development and civil society - Speech by President Islam Karimov at a ceremony dedicated to the 17th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan Newspaper Narodnoe Slovo on December 6, 2009, pages 5-12.
  34. Ramírez, VGM, Collazos, OCA, 2016. Impacto de las herramientas Web 2.0 va 3.0 en virtual cursos virtuales de computación móvil y seguridad en aplicaciones móviles. In: 2016 IEEE 11th Columbia Computing Conference (CCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ColumbianCC.2016.7750795. Google Scholar.
  35. A. Ahmedbekov “Computer graphics in the AutoCAD-2000 Ru system” Tashkent, 2004 Pages 20-59.
  36. B. Barchard and others. “The inner world of AutoCAD” (translated from English) Kyiv: DIA Soft, 2000, 1, 2, 3, and 4.
  37. Cabrol, M., Székely, M., 2012. Educación para la transformación. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Acosta, A., Blanco, R., Eroles, D., Goldberg, M. Retrieved from http://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/392. Google Scholar.
  38. A. L. Kheyfes “Computer Engineering Graphics” M, MIFI Dialogue 2002. Pages 101-119.
  39. A. L. Kheyfes "Computer Engineering Graphics" St. Petersburg: BHB: Petersburg, 2005. Pages 100-120.
  40. T. A. Stelman G.V. Krishnan (translated from English) Auto CAD 2005 Official course textbook with the disk, Moscow, 2005. Pages 7-21.
  41. Cabrol, M., Székely, M., 2012. Educación para la transformación. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Acosta, A., Blanco, R., Eroles, D., Goldberg, M. Retrieved from http://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/392. Google Scholar.
  42. R. U. Sindarov Laboratory workshop on the creation of geometric constructions in the environment of AutoCAD. - Tashkent: TADI, methodological manual, 2013. - 30 pages.
  43. Randy Н. Sigh. AutoCAD 2014 Tutorial - First Level: 2D Fundamentals. - SDC publications. Pages12-55.
  44. M. Coto, C.a. Collazos, S. Mora-RiveraModelo Colaborativo y Ubicuo para apoyar los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje a nivel Iberoamericano Rev. Educ. Distance (RED) (48) (2016), 10.6018/red/48/10. Google Scholar.
  45. E. M. Kudryavtsev Workshop on COMPASS. 3D.V8, Petersburg 2007. 12-55 pages.
  46. Y. P. Bezhenar, Computer-graphic modelling as a means of forming a graphic culture. - Vitebsk: Vitebsk. State Univ. 2008. - 139 page.
  47. Frigg, S., Hartmann, R., 2006. Models in Science. Google Scholar.
  48. Voronina M.V, Moroz O.N, Sudarikov A.E, Rakhimzhanova M.B, Muratbakeev E.K, Systematic review and results of the experiment of a flipped learning model for the courses of descriptive geometry, engineering and computer graphics, computer geometry// Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Volume 13, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 4831-4845.
  49. Shevchenko N.I. Pedagogical technologies: the socialization of schoolchildren in social studies. Moscow: Russian Word, 2008.127 pages.
  50. Willcox, K.E., Sarma, S., Lippel, P.H., 2016. Online education: a catalyst for higher education reforms, 39. Google Scholar.
  51. Melnikova E.L. "A problematic lesson or how to discover knowledge with students." Moscow: APK and PRO, 2002. 168 pages.
  52. General and professional pedagogy / V.D. Simonenko [et al.]. - Moscow: Ventana - Graf, 2005. - 368 pages.
  53. Azhgibkova T.N. The technology of using audiovisual teaching aids at universities // Innovations in education. - 2004. - No. 2. - Pages 111–123.
  54. S. Behera E- and M-Learning : a comparative study Int. J. New Trends Educ. Their Implications (2013), pp. 65-78 Retrieved from http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/08.behera.pdf. View Record in Scopus, Google Scholar.
  55. Zinny, G.S., 2015. EDUCACION 3.0 (Norma). Bogota. Google Scholar, View Abstract.
  56. Monakhov B. E., Tel’noy V.I. Study of engineering graphics using remote information technologies [The study of Engineering Graphics through the Use of Distance Learning Information Technologies]. Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference «Modern Information Technologies and IT education». Moscow, Moscow State University, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 354 — 357.
  57. Monakhov B.E., Tel’noy V.I. Training and control of the knowledge of inscribed geometry using distance education technologies [Training and Assessment of Academic Performance in Descriptive Geometry through the Employment of Distance Learning Technologies]. Collection of selected works of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference «Modern Information Technologies and IT education». Moscow, INTUIT.RU Publ., 2011, pp. 389 – 395
  58. Kiani, M., Asemi, A., CheshmehSohrabi, M., & Shabani, A. (2020). "Information ecology of bioinformatic in Web of Science with emphasizing on articles thematic interaction." Webology, 17(1), Article 215. Available at: http://www.webology.org/2020/v17n1/a215.pdf.
Loading...
0

Views

0

Reads

0

Comments

0

Reviews

0

Liked

0

Shared

0

Bibliography

0

Citations

Like and share on

Cite this publication

Copy text below and use in your article